You are here

Judicial retirement

Increasing Retirement Age for Judges Rejected in NY; PA Votes to Retain Two Supreme Court Justices

Submitted by Amaris Elliott-Engel on Tue, 11/05/2013 - 22:31

All the poll results aren't in, but it looks like New York voters have rejected by two-thirds a ballot measure to let Court of Appeals judges and trial-level state Supreme Court justices serve until they are 80. Now, Court of Appeals judges must retire at 70 and Supreme Court justices must retire at age 76. As of 10:28 p.m., 35.5% of the ballots counted so far favored increasing the retirement age and 64.5% disfavored increasing the retirement age.

It also looks like Pennsylvania voters have voted to retain the two justices running for retention on the state Supreme Court. Pennsylvania Chief Justice Ronald D. Castille, a Republican from Philadelphia, can serve one more year until he has to retire, and Justice Max Baer, a Democrat from Pittsburgh, can serve four more years until he has to retire. As of 10:20 p.m., the Pennsylvania Department of State reported that 70.93% of voters cast ballots to retain Baer and 68.91% of voters cast ballots to retain Castille.

UPDATE: Full results show as of 10:25 a.m. Wednesday that the efforts to increase the retirement age failed in New York and that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court justices were indeed retained.

Increasing Judicial Retirement Age Could Prevent Cuomo's Stamp on NY's Highest Court

New Yorkers will vote on a ballot measure that would increase the age at which appellate judges have to retire to age 80. The New York Times reports that Governor Andrew Cuomo has been quietly opposing Proposition 6. One reason may be that if the ballot meaure passes it would "allow two Republican judges to serve longer terms, limiting his ability to put a lasting liberal stamp on the Court of Appeals," The Times reports.

Raising the retirement ages of judges isn't just a New York issue. Legislation in Pennsylvania has advanced that would increase the retirement age for judges from age 70 to age 75. The legislation has to pass the Pennsylvania General Assembly another year before it can go to voters to approve it in 2015.

PA Judges Lose Lawsuit Challenging Mandatory Retirement

After Pennsylvania state-court judges lost their challenge in the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to the constitutionality of the requirement that they retire in the year that they turn 70, they now have lost in federal court too, The Legal Intelligencer reports. The federal judge rejected both their equal protection and due process claims, citing binding precedent. The judge also rejected arguments that he should apply a higher standard of review than rational basis and that the US Supreme Court's holding in United States v. Windsor rejecting the federal Defense Of Marriage Act provided more support for the judicial plaintiffs' position. There also are bills pending in the General Assembly to put constitutional amendments before voters on either eliminating judicial retirement altogether or to raise the mandatory retirement age to 75.

Subscribe to RSS - Judicial retirement