You are here

business of law

Drone Law is Emerging Practice Area for Lawyers

Legal issues involving drones are an emerging practice area for lawyers, the Connecticut Law Tribune reports. One incident, involving a journalist trying to use a drone to shoot video of a fatal car crash, is being investigated by Hartford police and the Federal Aviation Administration, CLT also reports.

Jonathan Orleans, of Pullman & Comley attorney, told CLT "'there will certainly be negligence and invasion of privacy claims made. And where the drone was operated for a government entity, such as for law enforcement purposes, there will be issues of government immunity. Given the multiplicity of potential uses for the technology and the inventiveness of lawyers, the potential for legal work is quite large."'

National Law Firm Wilson Elser Aims to Duplicate Albany Lobbying Success in Hartford

Submitted by Amaris Elliott-Engel on Mon, 01/13/2014 - 11:20

I wrote a piece for the Connecticut Law Tribune about Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker looking to duplicate its lobbying success in New York's capital in Connecticut. The firm has opened a new office in Hartford, the second one in Connecticut. An excerpt of the piece:

Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker is looking to duplicate the lobbying success it's had at New York's capital at Connecticut's seat of government, firm leaders said. In early January, the national law firm announced the opening of a new office in Hartford that will focus in part on governmental relations.

Wilson Elser "has the most successful lobbying firm in Albany," said David A. Rose, the partner responsible for forming the law firm's governmental relations practice in Connecticut. According to the New York State Joint Commission on Public Ethics, Wilson Elser has more than 160 lobbying clients in Albany.

As for the goals in Connecticut, Rose noted that Wilson Elser does not have a "niche lobbying practice" like some other firms.

"We're a law firm," Rose said. "As long as we can ensure there's not a conflict with any existing clients we're hopeful to work with as many and varied" lobbying clients as Wilson Elser does in Albany.

Rose has been involved in governmental affairs for 21 years either as a governmental lawyer or lobbyist. He worked as senior counsel for two Connecticut House speakers: Democrats Moira Lyons and James Amann. In 2007, he went to work as assistant counsel for then-New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer and stayed on through the tenure of Gov. David Patterson and then through the transition of Gov. Andrew Cuomo.

While there are a lot of similarities between Hartford and Albany, Rose said that "Connecticut has a much more transparent government" that is easier to access as a lobbyist or as a regular citizen. Unlike in Albany, anyone can walk into the Capitol building in Hartford without having to pass through metal detectors, he said.

If you spend enough time in the building, you will run into state leaders just by virtue of using the common elevators and corridors, Rose said.
"You have to be at the Capitol," Rose said, to have the opportunity to meet with top lawmakers, including the happenstance meetings in which elevator speeches for clients can be rolled out. There's nothing that beats the in-person interaction to "tell your client's story," Rose said.

Many Med Mal Cases Lapse For Lack of Attorneys Who Will Take Them

ProPublica reports on a little-covered problem: some people harmed by medical malpractice can't find any attorneys to take their cases.

This is a phenomenon that many plaintiffs lawyers told me about when I was regularly reporting on medical-malpractice litigation for The Legal Intelligencer. Med mal cases are very expensive to work up because they require expert witnesses and scientific-oriented discovery, and many firms will not take cases in which the injury is less catastrophic or their are low economic damages because the return on investing in the case is so low.

ProPublica reports on the "problem faced by many who are harmed in a medical setting: Attorneys refuse their cases, not because the harm didn’t happen but because the potential economic damages are too low." This includes the elderly who have low incomes because they are retired, because their medical bills are picked up by Medicare and they typically have no dependents, ProPublica further reports.

JPMorgan Creates $23 Billion Reserve Fund For Litigation Costs

As JPMorgan's legal costs mount from several governmental investigations, the investment firm has set aside a $23 billion reserve fund for litigation costs, The New York Times reports. But all the bank's legal woes will be good for law firms: "Even as defense lawyers publicly complain that government regulators are being too aggressive, they privately celebrate the windfall. Law firms in New York and Washington are collectively earning many hundreds of millions of dollars representing JPMorgan in cases ranging from weak controls against money laundering to commodities trading, according to interviews with senior partners at several of top firms," The Times also reports.

Wall Street Journal Looks At Risks In Lawsuit Lending (subscription required)

Two recent losses by litigation-funding outfits led to this interesting report from the Wall Street Journal. One tidbit: "Litigation finance is a growing field that now includes a number of specialty firms that maintain multimillion-dollar portfolios devoted to legal investments. Hedge funds and individual investors also occasionally purchase stakes in litigation as part of a broader investment strategy. There at least five litigation-finance firms in the U.S., U.K. and Australia that have $100 million or more under management. With litigation finance, funders advance money to help people and companies pay for lawsuits they would otherwise be unable to pursue. Critics are concerned that the practice could give outside investors undue influence over legal decisions and allow frivolous lawsuits to go forward, driving up the overall cost of litigation."

Pages

Subscribe to RSS - business of law