You are here

estate law

Power of Attorney Reform Aims to Stop Banks from Upending Estate Planning

Submitted by Amaris Elliott-Engel on Thu, 10/20/2016 - 18:05

Here's a recent piece I wrote for the Connecticut Law Tribune about reforms to that state's power of attorney law:

Sweeping changes have been made to Connecticut's power-of-attorney law, including making it harder for banks to upend the wishes of people who do estate planning by rejecting power-of-attorney forms.

Reforms to the law came into effect Oct. 1. Leaders in the Connecticut field say this is the first time the law has been updated for decades.

Paul Knierim, probate court administrator for Connecticut, said it has been commonplace for banks to frustrate the purpose of estate planning by rejecting power-of-attorney forms (POAs) at a stage when a senior citizen or a person with disabilities no longer has the competency to execute a form that would meet the bank's liking.

"The whole purpose of a durable power of attorney is to plan ahead … but [when] a bank won't accept the power of attorney the very purpose of the power of attorney gets frustrated," Knierim said.

The law will ensure that people will not have their "long-term estate planning upended by the whim of a bank teller," said Deborah Tedford, an estate attorney with the Tedford Law Firm in Mystic who was involved in drafting the new POA forms.

With the law change, family members can now go to probate court to enforce POAs and be awarded attorney fees and other costs if a bank or another third party is not following the law, Knierim said. The probate courts have been granted new authority to compel financial institutions to accept POAs.

On the other hand, bank personnel can also ask the court to review the actions of a person who has a POA if they have concerns that the person who granted the POA is being exploited, Knierim said.

The law also provides safe harbors to financial institutions who accept POAs, Tedford said.

There is now a POA long form and a POA short form that have been put into the law, said Tedford and Suzanne Brown Walsh, a partner at Murtha Cullina who focuses on trusts and estates and also helped shape the statutory forms.

Connecticut adopted a model law promulgated by the Uniform Law Commission, but further tweaks were made this year because the 2015 law was enacted in a hurry by Connecticut legislators, Tedford and Walsh said. The 2015 law envisioned one long form, but the revisions have resulted in a short form and a long form, they said.

The short form can be used to grant a power of attorney for real estate transactions and is signed at the end, Tedford and Walsh said.

The long form allows the person doing estate planning to initial certain types of powers they want to grant on the POA to their agent, including things such as making gifts, changing beneficiary designations and creating and terminating trusts. There is a third option under the law for attorneys to draft their own forms, Tedford and Walsh said.

The new law also is important because Connecticut is joining 20 other states that have enacted the model law, Walsh said. This means that it should be easier for elderly people, who relocate to be closer to their caregivers in other states, to have their POAs recognized, she said.

Another big change in the law is the expansion of the authority of Connecticut's probate courts to deal with people who are abusing the POA they have been granted, Knierim said.

"Powers of attorney are a double-edged sword," Knierim said. "They are an excellent tool for planning for incapacity. On the other hand, they are a very powerful instrument that a person who wants to do mischief can exploit. In the probate courts, we see, unfortunately, instances where agents under powers of attorney have abused the trust" placed in them.

As a result of those type of abuses, the category of people who can raise concerns about POA abuses has been expanded. For example, the law now states that a caregiver or a person who "demonstrates sufficient interest in the principal's welfare" can petition the court to review the actions of a POA agent.

Agents who abuse the POAs they have been granted also now can be ordered to reimburse for financial losses.

Connecticut's new POA law also has changed it so that POAs are assumed to be durable.

Attorneys should be aware that the new law does not address whether agents should be granted control in a POA over someone's email, social media accounts and other digital assets, Walsh said. Attorneys will have to add that authority in their own POA forms, she said.

The new law also is attempting to synthesize POAs with when courts authorize a conservatorship and appoint a guardian to manage the financial affairs of an elderly person or a person with disabilities, Knierim said. It used to be that the appointment of a conservator automatically terminated a POA.

Now, if someone has appointed a POA, the court has to determine if the POA can work in tandem with the conservator, Knierim said. This honors the first choice of people on who they wanted to have manage their affairs, Knierim said.

Mother Who Opposes Same-Sex Marriage Intervenes in Deceased Gay Son's Suit

A deceased Alabama man's same-sex spouse is seeking to overturn Alabama's ban on same-sex marriage and have their marriage in Massachusetts recognized for purposes of settling his estate, the Associated Press reports. But the man's mother opposes same-sex marriage and has intervened to prevent her son's estate being shared with his widower.

Missouri Supreme Court Rejects Survivor Benefits for Trooper's Same-Sex Partner

After Missouri State Trooper Dennis Engelhard was killed while investigating a traffic accident, his same-sex partner sought survivor benefits. Missouri pays benefits to the surivors of highway patrol officers killed in the line of duty, the Associated Press reported. The Missouri Supreme Court has ruled that because the couple were not married that no benefits are owed, according to the AP.

While Missouri prohibits same-sex marriage in its state constitution and a state law, “the result cannot be any different here simply because [Kelly] Glossip and the patrolman were of the same sex. The statute discriminates solely on the basis of marital status, not sexual orientation,” the majority of five justices said according to AP. 

The two-member dissent, however, said the statute should be struck down because it "specifically discriminate against gay men and lesbians by categorically denying them crucial state benefits when their partner dies in the line of duty," according to AP.
 

Loophole in Son of Sam Law May Entitle Children's Killer to Estate Proceeds

A mother who drowned her three children in a bathtub may be entitled to receive part of their $350,000 estate because she was found not guilty by reason of mental disease, the Associated Press reported. Nassau County Surrogate Court Judge Edward McCarty must decide next month if she is entitled to a share of the proceeds from two lawsuits in which the children's fathers claimed social workers failed to properly monitor the woman and children, the AP also reported. Nassau County settled the cases.

The AP also reports on the history of Son of Sam laws: "New York was the first state to enact a Son of Sam law in the 1970s following the capture of notorious serial killer David Berkowitz. Its intent was to bar Berkowitz and other criminals from profiting from their crimes through the commercial exploitation of their stories. The U.S. Supreme Court struck down the law in 1991 for violating the First Amendment’s guarantee of free expression, ruling it would have encompassed works including Henry David Thoreau’s 'Civil Disobedience' and 'The Autobiography of Malcolm X.'" Then New York revised its Son of Sam law.

Same-Sex Marriage Litigation Developments in PA, Ohio

The Associated Press reports two developments regarding same-sex marriage litigation in Pennsylvania and Ohio.

One, a lawsuit was filed in Pennsylvania state court to challenge the constitutionality of the ban on same-sex marriage under the state constitution. A federal lawsuit has already been filed. The litigants were issued marriage licenses in Montgomery County, Pa., after PA Attorney General Kathleen Kane rejected the legality of the ban and said her office would not defend it.

Two, a lawsuit in Ohio seeking for out-of-state marriages to be recognized on death certificates has been expanded to all similary situated couples. Despite a ban on same-sex marriages in Ohio, a judge has ruled in favor of two couples on the principle that Ohio recognizes all valid marriages from other states for ministerial acts like the issuance of death certificates. Read more: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2013/09/25/4341472/apnewsbreak-gay-marr...

Ohio Judge Orders Recognition of Out-of-State Same-Sex Marriage On Death Certificate

While Ohio bans same-sex marriages, a judge has ruled that a valid same-sex marriage entered into in another state must be recognized on a death certificate. Ohio recognizes marriages from other states that it would not allow under its own law, the judge said, so same-sex marriages must be given the same comity and full-faith credit. “This is not a complicated case,” the judge wrote, according to the Gay People's Chronicle. “The issue is whether the state of Ohio can discriminate against same sex marriages lawfully solemnized out of state, when Ohio law has historically and unambiguously provided that the validity of a marriage is determined by whether it complies with the law of the jurisdiction where it was celebrated.”

 

Subscribe to RSS - estate law